USTAVNI SUD

The applicant filed a referral requesting the assessment of constitutionality of Decisions of Special Chamber of the Supreme Court where the applicant filed a complaint against the KTA, which did not include him in the list of legitimate workers who would benefit from 20% of the revenues from privatisation of the factory where he used to work, He contended that in this case his human rights were denied, as well as equality before the law and the right to liberty and security were violated, The Constitutional Court decided to reject applicant’s referral as inadmissible with reasoning that the referral is time barred as it was submitted after the deadline foreseen by the Law on the Court and as such is cannot be considered that the applicant has met the admissibility criteria