Resolution

Constitutional Review of the Supreme Court Judgment Rev. I. No. 366/2009 dated 15 March 2012

Case No. KI 67/12

Applicant: Shaban Kadrija

The Applicant claims that his rights to work as guaranteed by the Constitution and international standards have been violated, The Applicant expects the Constitutional Court to enable him to return to his earlier workplace, He requests the Court to nullify all judgments issued by regular courts, The Applicant also requests that the Constitutional Court order a monetary compensation for his alleged loss of income including the court fees, The Court considers that there is nothing in the Referral which indicates that the case lacked impartiality or that proceedings were otherwise unfair, The Applicant has neither built a case on a violation of any of his rights guaranteed by the Constitution nor has he submitted any prima facie evidence on such a violation, thus, the Constitutional Court declares the Referral inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded

Applicant:

Shaban Kadrija

Type of Referral:

KI – Individual Referral

Type of act:

Resolution

Referral is manifestly ill-founded

Type of procedure followed before other institutions :

Civil