Resolution

Constitutional Review of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, Rev. no. 521/2009, dated 4 June 2012

Case No. KI 83/12

Applicant: Muhamet Ukalo, Neime Ukalo

The applicants filed a Referral pursuant to Article 113,7 of the Constitution of Kosovo challenging the decision of the Supreme Court, Rev, no, 521/2009, of 4 June 2012, because the Applicants, allegedly, are “[…] owners of the contested immovable property because they have inherited it, This right, by the Constitution, is untouchable and guaranteed, However, with the regular courts judgments, the right to property is with A,Q,,” Furthermore, the Applicants also alleges that the Municipal Court in Prizren on 2 June 2008 was impartial because it did not act in accordance with the remarks given by the Supreme Court, On the issue of the admissibility of the Referral, the Court held that the Referral was inadmissible because the Applicants did not substantiate a claim on constitutional grounds and did not provide evidence that his rights and freedoms has been violated by the Supreme Court

Applicant:

Muhamet Ukalo, Neime Ukalo

Type of Referral:

KI – Individual Referral

Type of act:

Resolution

Referral is manifestly ill-founded

Type of procedure followed before other institutions :

Civil