Constitutional Court

The applicant filed a referral challenging judgments of the Supreme Court, District Court and Municipal Court, thereby claiming that her rights to a fair and impartial trial were violated, without providing any other argument, The Constitutional Court decided to reject the applicant’s referral as inadmissible, thereby reasoning that she failed to clarify or specify further the manner in which her constitutionally guaranteed rights were violated, Further, the Court found that the referral did not contain any fact to suggest that previous procedures were biased or unfair, According to the Court, the fact that the applicant is discontented with the outcome of the case is not an argument for violation of the Article 31 of the Constitution on fair and impartial trial