The Applicant claimed that the District Court in Prizren and the Supreme Court, have violated her rights guaranteed by Article 31 [Right to Fair and Impartial Trial] of the Constitution and Articles 6 and 14 of ECHR, The Applicant complained on grounds of substantial violation of procedural provisions, incomplete and erroneous determination of factual situation and erroneous application of the substantive law, The Court in this case noted that the Applicant did not present any argument and evidence on how and why the Supreme Court violated her rights and fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, No allegation filed on the ground of constitutionality was made by the Applicant, either implicitly or in substance, which would refer the alleged violation on human rights and fundamental freedoms, guaranteed by the Constitution and International Instruments, In sum, the Court noted that the Applicant’s Referral did not meet the required criteria pursuant to Rule 36 (1) c) and (2) a) and d) of the Rules of Procedure, and as such, is found inadmissible
Jasmine Baxhaku
KI – Individual Referral
Resolution
Referral is manifestly ill-founded
Civil