Constitutional Court

The Applicant claimed that the judicial authorities in their decisions violated his rights guaranteed by Article 49 of the Constitution, The Applicant requested from the Constitutional Court to quash the Judgment of the Supreme Court Rev, no, 297/ 2012 of 2 May 2013 and the Judgment of the District Court in Peja, AC, no, 73/ 2009 of 28 June 2010, The Court found that that the Applicant has failed to prove that the challenged judgments violated his constitutional right guaranteed by Article 49 of the Constitution, He did not clarify why and how the court authorities have violated his rights from the Constitution, Therefore, the Court concluded that the Applicant’s Referral does not meet the admissibility requirements, because it is manifestly ill-founded, and, as such, it is declared inadmissible