Constitutional Court

The applicant filed a referral whereby it requested from the Court to “assess the legality of laws and fairness in the courts and administrative bodies” by providing different observations of social issues during the past decade as well as some events in his life, He posed a question to the Court as to “why the Law on Pension Insurance is not being applied?”, he than referred to an administrative dispute which he challenged at the Municipal Court in Ferizaj and no decision was taken for two years; then he challenged the constitutionality of RTK fee which is collected through electricity bills, the material damages which were caused by constant electricity cuts, and at the end he mentioned the petition of many citizens which was not taken into consideration by the Assembly of Kosovo, by asking for legal advice on how to protect the rights that have been denied to him, By analysing each and every issue separately, the Constitutional Court decided that the petitioner in principle did not exhaust all legal remedies available and that he did not manage to provide sufficient evidence in order to prove that his individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution have been violated by the omissions of different instances mentioned by him, Hence, the court considered that the applicant requested for abstract control of constitutionality, which right according to Article 113.7 does not extend to individuals, and he thus lacks locus standi , and the court found the case inadmissible