Constitutional Court

The referral is based on Article 113,7 of the Constitution, Article 22 of the Law and Rule 56 of Rules of Procedure, The Applicant, without mentioning any particular constitutional provision claimed that his constitutional rights had been violated, The Court emphasizes that matters of fact or law are within the jurisdiction of regular courts and that it cannot act as a court of appeals or a fourth instance court, Furthermore the applicant did not provide any evidence on violations of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, The Court, further reasons that the mere fact that Applicant is unsatisfied with the outcome of the case cannot serve as the right to file an arguable claim on violation of rights guaranteed by the Constitution, Due to the above mentioned reasons, the Court pursuant to Article 113,7 of the Constitution, Article 20 of the Law and Rule 56 (2) of the Rules of Procedure decided to reject as inadmissible the Applicant’s referral