Constitutional review of the Judgment of the Municipal Court in Prizren C.no.61/2008 dated 16 October 2009 and of the Judgment of the District Court in Prizren AC.no.158/2010 dated 10 October 2011 and Request for imposition of interim measure
Case No. KI 41/13
Applicant: Sadik Qollopeku
The Applicant alleged that the Judgment of the Municipal Court in Prizren, C, no, 61/08, of 16 October 2009, and the Judgment of the District Court in Prizren, Ac, No, 158/2010, of 10 October 2011, have violated his rights guaranteed by Article 3, paragraph 1 and 2, Article 21, Article 31 and Article 46, paragraph 3 of the Constitution as well as Articles 6 and 14 of ECHR, In this case, the Court found that the Applicant’s Referral was premature, since the property dispute was still pending the decision by the Court of Appeals in Prishtina, Therefore, the Court considered that the Applicant did not exhaust all legal remedies provided by law, Since the Referral did not meet the admissibility procedural criteria, the request for imposition of interim measure was rejected by the Court as inadmissible
Sadik Qollopeku
KI – Individual Referral
Resolution
Legal remedies are not exhausted
Civil