Constitutional Court

The Applicant requests constitutional review of the Judgment of the Supreme Court (Rev, No, 121/2010, of 19 February 2013), which upheld the Judgments of the Municipal Court in Gjakova and of the District Court in Peja, The Judgment of the Municipal Court in Gjakova rejected the claim of the Applicant and other claimants for confirmation of the ownership over immovable properties of their predecessors, or exchange with other properties, or pecuniary compensation, The Applicant alleges that the Judgment of the Supreme Court (Rev, No, 121/2010 of 19 February 2013) violates his rights guaranteed by the Constitution, respectively Article 46 [Protection of Property], Article 3 [Equality before the Law], and Article 24,1 [Equality before the Law] of the Constitution, The Court considered that the facts presented by the Applicant do not in any way justify the allegation of a violation of the constitutional rights and the Applicant has not sufficiently substantiated his allegation