Constitutional Court

The referral is based on Article 113,7 of the Constitution, Article 20 of the Law and Rule 56 (2) of the Rules of Procedure, The applicant among other claimed that his right to property had been violated, The Court, among other, notes that the Applicant’s submission to the regular courts to exercise his right to property is still ongoing which deems the referral before the Constitutional Court premature, which means that the Applicant had not exhausted all legal remedies, Due to the above mentioned reasons, the Court pursuant to Article 113,7 of the Constitution, Rule 36 (1) h) and Rule 56 (2) of the Rules of Procedure decided to reject as inadmissible the Applicant’s referral