KI52/19, Drilon Sadriu Request for constitutional review of Decision REV. No. 6/2019 of the Supreme Court, of 07 February 2019
KI52/19, Resolution on Inadmissibility of 25 September 2019, published on 18 October 2019
Keywords: Resolution on inadmissibility, request for compensation, manifestly ill-founded
The Applicant initiated the contested proceedings against the Insurance Company following the traffic accident in which he was a victim.
The courts partially approved the Applicant’s statement of claim and awarded him a certain amount of money as a form of compensation for his physical injuries and mental distress.
The Applicant considered that the courts have erroneously applied the substantive law in determining the amount of monetary compensation, which led to a violation of his rights guaranteed by Articles 24, 31 of the Constitution and Articles 10 and 14 of the ECHR.
Examining the Applicant’s allegations, the case file and the challenged court decisions, the Court concluded that the Applicant’s allegations are ungrounded.
Drilon Sadriu
KI – Individual Referral
Resolution
Referral is manifestly ill-founded
Civil