Resolution

Constitutional review of the reconsideration decision of the Housing and Property Claims Commission HPCC/REC/101/2008 of 19 June 2008

Case No. KI 84/11

Applicant: Rexhep Ademi

The Applicant filed a Referral pursuant to Article 113.7 of the Constitution, asserting that Article 22 of the Constitution was violated when the Kosovo Property Agency evicted the Applicant and his family from their apartment for nonpayment of rent, The Court held that the Referral was manifestly unfounded and inadmissible pursuant to Article 48 of the Law on the Constitutional Court and Rule 36.2(b) under the Rules of Procedure because the Applicant failed to submit prima facie evidence substantiating a constitutional violation, citing Vanek v. Slovak Republic. After examining the evidence, the Court did not find that the proceedings were in any way unfair or tainted by arbitrariness, citing Shub v. Lithuania

Applicant:

Rexhep Ademi

Type of Referral:

KI – Individual Referral

Type of act:

Resolution

Referral is manifestly ill-founded

Type of procedure followed before other institutions :

Civil