Constitutional Court

The Applicant filed a Referral pursuant to Article 113.7 of the Constitution, asserting that his constitutional rights were infringed by a judgment of the Supreme Court, which affirmed decisions of the lower courts rejecting the Applicant’s complaint regarding a hiring decision made by the Obiliq Centre for Social Welfare, The applicant argued that the judgment of the Supreme Court violated Article 31 of the Constitution because it failed to resolve material differences between evidence submitted by the parties, The Court held that the Referral was manifestly ill-founded and therefore inadmissible pursuant to Article 48 of the Law on the Constitutional Court and Rule 36.2(b) of the Rules of Procedure because it failed to produce prima facie evidence substantiating a constitutional violation, citing Vanek v. Slovak Republic