Constitutional Court

The Applicant claims that “the final decision…is discriminatory against me, since the Court had to consider the real situation in our health care system, and the patients scheduling major services in state hospitals have to wait for long periods due to large number of patients, and at time to file a complaint against the Court ruling, I had scheduled my graph with UCCK,,,” , The Applicant claims that Article 24 [Equality before Law] and Article 31 [Right to Fair and Impartial Trial] of the Constitution have been violated by the Special Chamber, Accordingly, the Court finds that the Referral was not referred to the court in a legal manner, pursuant to Article 113,1 of the Constitution, Article 48 of the Law and Rule 36 (1) c) and (2) d) of the Rules, and as such is inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded