Constitutional Court

The Referral is based on Article 113,7 of the Constitution, Article 20 of the Law and Rule 56 (2) of the Rules of Procedure,The Applicant, among others, claimed that the decisions of the regular courts are unlawful because his case was reviewed in an erroneous manner and that the factual situation was determined in incomplete manner, The Court stressed that questions of fact and law are matters of jurisdiction, autonomy and prerogative of regular courts, The Court further noted that the fact that the Applicant is unsatisfied with the outcome of the case, cannot serve him as the right to file an arguable claim for violation of the constitutional provisions, Due to the mentioned reasons, the Court, based on Article 113,7 of the Constitution, Article 20 of the Law and Rule 36 (1) c) of the Rules of Procedure, decided to reject the Referral as inadmissible