Constitutional Court

The Applicant filed a Referral pursuant to Article 113.7 of the Constitution, asserting that his Constitutional right to work was infringed by a judgment of the Supreme Court, which upheld his dismissal from his job following a disciplinary action, The Court held that the Referral was inadmissible because it was submitted almost eleven months after the Applicant’s receipt of the Supreme Court’s final judgment, which was beyond the 4-month deadline set by Article 49 of the Law on the Constitutional Court