Constitutional Court

The applicant filed a referral alleging the violation of right to work, which according to him, was a result of application of discriminatory practices in employment, when the applicant was refused employment because he “was from another municipality”, The applicant did not provide any details if he had used any other legal remedies that may have been available, The Constitutional Court rejected the referral as inadmissible, reasoning that the applicant failed to provide any evidence that he had used other legal remedies available, thus not meeting the requirements for filing a referral, as per Article 113.7