Constitutional Court

The applicant stated that the contested decision of a public authority violated his constitutional right to work (Article 49 – The right to work and exercise profession), Constitutional Court finds no evidence that the Supreme Court did not adjudicate a “fair and impartial trial” bringing the decision as to the revision of the abovementioned and does not find that with that decision the rights guaranteed by the Constitution have been violated, In these circumstances the Applicant, did not “sufficiently substantiate his claim”, and the Constitutional Court finds no violation of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and therefore according to the Rule 36 paragraph 2 item c and d, decides to reject the Referral as manifestly ill founded.