Constitutional Court

The applicant filed a referral by which he claims that his right to fair and impartial trial was violated by the judgment of the Supreme Court, which according to him, had erroneously sentenced him for one of the criminal offences he was accused for, because it had failed to consider evidence he had offered for the contrary, The Constitutional Court decided to reject the referral as inadmissible, thereby reasoning that the complaint of the applicant dates before the entry into force of the Constitution, and therefore, the Court found this referral to be time-barred and in contradiction in “ratione temporis” with provisions of the Constitution and the law