Constitutional Court

Applicant submitted a referral challenging the Decision of Municipal Court, which had claimed not to have jurisdiction to annul a decision for expropriation of their property, alleging that this denied his right to property, He requests from the Constitutional Court to suspend all economic activities of the company that was constructing in the property, which he claims was forced to sell to that company, which later accused him for not fulfilling the terms of contract, Constitutional Court decided to reject applicant’s referral as inadmissible with reasoning that applicant did not provide any prima facie evidence to support the claim for violation of his constitutional rights