The Applicant, a Kosovar citizen, filed a Referral pursuant to Article 113.7 of the Constitution, asserting that the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) violated his rights under Articles 24 and 35 of the Constitution when extraditing him from a country in the European Union, The Applicant requested that he be afforded rights belonging to citizens of the EU country, that the MOJ compensate him for the monthly salary that he would have earned if he had remained in the EU country during the 8 years following his extradition, that he be granted citizenship in the EU country (which would enable him to continue his education) and that he be returned to his job there, The Court held that the Referral was manifestly unfounded and inadmissible pursuant to Rule 36 of the Rules of Procedure because the Applicant had failed to make a prima facie showing that his Constitutional rights had been violated and because he did not substantiate the basis for fulfillment of his other requests, citing Vanek v. Slovak Republic
Azem Ademi vs. the Ministry of Justice
KI – Individual Referral
Resolution
Referral is manifestly ill-founded
Civil