Constitutional Court

The Applicant filed a referral against the District Public Prosecutor in Mitrovica who according to him has failed to prosecute the alleged perpetrators for committing a theft in his house despite the fact that the applicant reported the case, The applicant alleges that he had sent many letters to different institutions but received no response, and thus he addressed the case with the Court, The Constitutional Court decided to reject the case as inadmissible with a reasoning that the applicant did not exhaust legal remedies foreseen by the law, by failing to claim for compensation from the alleged perpetrators of the theft and he did not prove that he was precluded from making such a claim