Constitutional Court

KI51/18, Applicant: Sahit Musa as alleged representative of V.Z., P.Z., A.Z., A.Z., Sh. Z. and Xh. Z., constitutional review of Notification KMLC. No. 60/14 of the State Prosecutor, of 22 July 2014

 KI51/18, Decision to reject the Referral of 30 May 2018, published on 11 June 2018.

Keywords: Individual referral, unauthorized representative, incomplete Referral, summarily rejection

Referral was submitted by an attorney who assumes to be authorized to represent V.Z., P.Z., A.Z., A.Z., Sh. Z. and Xh. Z. The Court requested the unauthorized representative to complete the Referral Form and submit the respective power of attorney. However, the unauthorized representative did not submit the requested documents. Accordingly, the Court concluded that that the Referral is incomplete and not clearly stated. Therefore, the Court found that the Referral is to be summarily rejected in accordance with Rule 32 (5) of the Rules of Procedure.